Saturday, August 29, 2015

What’s great in GPS

What’s great in GPS

Standalone GPS devices still make sense for some users. They can spare your smartphone battery power and make it easier to make calls. Here are four “no regrets” choices:

Garmin Nuvi 3597 LMTHD, $330

The Garmin Nuvi 3597 provides local speed limits, traffic information for secondary and tertiary roads, and advanced lane guidance to help you get in the correct one for an exit. And the magnetic dock for the windshield mount that’s included is easy to use.

Garmin NuviCam LMTHD, $400

The Garmin NuviCam LMTHD is pricey but useful. It alerts you if you’re drifting from your lane, facilitates hands-free calls from a phone, and has a dash camcorder that will automatically retain video and still images in the event of a collision.

Garmin Nuvi 57LMT, $170

The Garmin Nuvi 57LMT points out landmarks, traffic lights, highway exits, and other points of interest, and includes free lifetime map updates and traffic alerts. The onscreen speedometer glows when you exceed local speed limits. It can be paired with a BC 30 wireless backup camera (sold separately) to show obstacles when you drive in reverse.

Magellan SmartGPS 5390, $170

The Magellan SmartGPS 5390 includes Bluetooth connectivity for hands-free calling from your phone. Multidestination routing makes it easy to add stops along a route. And the unit shows you with clear visual cues where to change lanes before an exit.

Check out “Hidden Helpers in Your Phone,” for more smartphone functionality.

This article also appeared in the October 2015 issue of Consumer Reports magazine.

Consumer Reports has no relationship with any advertisers on this website. Copyright © 2006-2015 Consumers Union of U.S.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
                submit to reddit    


from Consumer Reports http://ift.tt/1hLWczZ via dryer vent cleaning jacksonville fl
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1VmP6QK

What the coming ban on partially hydrogenated oil means for you

What the coming ban on partially hydrogenated oil means for you

In the nutrition world, few food components are as widely reviled as trans fats, which hide out in chips, crackers, and countless other processed and deep-fried foods, and have been proved to increase your risk of heart disease. In June, the Food and Drug Administration announced that manufacturers have until 2018 to rid their products of the primary source of trans fats, partially hydrogenated oils (PHOs). It’s an important step that the agency estimates will save $140 billion in health care and other costs nationwide over 20 years.

Here’s the potential impact on your kitchen cabinet and your health:

The trouble with trans fat

PHOs are created by adding hydrogen to vegetable oil, making it solid at room temperature and less likely to spoil. Like saturated fat, trans fat not only increases your blood levels of LDL (bad) cholesterol but also lowers HDL (good) cholesterol. It may also cause inflammation and lead to heart attack or stroke. Research has also found links to type 2 diabetes and problems with memory and other cognitive functions.

Right now the FDA permits food manufacturers to label foods containing less than 0.5 grams of trans fat per serving as containing 0 grams, which means that certain products purporting to be trans fat–free may, in fact, have some.

By June 2018, PHOs cannot even be included as an ingredient. That will change the makeup of thousands of products whose manufacturers had been rounding down on nutrition labels.

The new rule and your taste buds

If you haven’t yet noticed a change, it probably means very little: Many processed-food manufacturers have already dropped PHOs from their products without any noticeable difference in flavor or texture. (Between 2003 and 2012 Americans’ trans-fat consumption fell by 78 percent, according to an FDA estimate.)

The new rule and your health

Early research yields hopeful results: One European study estimated that a ban on trans fats in restaurants in New York City and six counties resulted in 12 fewer deaths from cardiovascular disease per 100,000 people and a health care savings of $3 million per 100,000 people each year.

According to the Grocery Manufacturers Association, some companies will switch to alternatives such as palm oil and palm kernel oil—either alone or combined with liquid canola, sunflower, or soybean oil. Both palm and palm kernel oils are high in saturated fat, which raises bad cholesterol levels. Some companies are developing soybeans—through conventional crossbreeding as well as by genetic engineering in a lab—that produce trans fat-free oil that is also lower in saturated fat than most typical trans-fat alternatives. But GMOs may lead to a variety of health and environmental problems, our experts say, and will carry no GMO labeling.

Trans fats’ long goodbye

Companies can petition for a specific use of PHOs in their products post-June 2018, as long as the additive meets the FDA’s safety standards. (An FDA spokesperson told us that if the specific use is approved, the agency will publish an additive regulation.) For now your best bet is to keep checking ingredients lists for PHOs and, of course, to avoid processed, high-fat foods in general—as well as limiting beef, cheese, and full-fat dairy products, where small amounts of naturally occurring trans fats will still be found.

This article also appeared in the October 2015 issue of Consumer Reports magazine.

 

Consumer Reports has no relationship with any advertisers on this website. Copyright © 2006-2015 Consumers Union of U.S.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
                submit to reddit    


from Consumer Reports http://ift.tt/1fOajTv via dryer vent cleaning jacksonville fl
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1O0FOFw

Top headphones for $200 or less

Top headphones for $200 or less

You know a product is hot when the fashion industry makes it a wildly overpriced accessory. Earlier this year, jewel-encrusted headphones from the Italian designers Dolce & Gabbana showed up on runways with a price tag of almost $8,000. But you don’t have to sacrifice months of mortgage payments to find top headphones.

Our in-depth tests of more than 150 headphones identified 28 models that offer great sound for less than $200. All of them should be a big step up from the freebies that might have come with your phone. To choose the top headphones, ask yourself the following questions.

What’s your idea of comfort?

Some people love to wear turtlenecks, but others feel as if they’re being strangled by them. Comfort is just as subjective when it comes to headphones. Many listeners are comfortable wearing insert-style earphones that go into the ear canal, or earbuds that rest in the bowl of the ear, but others find them irritating. (Switching to a different-sized tip can help.) Some users prefer on-ear or over-ear headphones (picture earmuffs). But others balk at their bulk or complain that they interfere with eyeglasses or earrings. Also, they can make your ears hot and sweaty, especially if you wear them for a long stretch.

Are they mainly for exercising?

Almost two-thirds of headphone users wear them while working out, according to the research firm NPD. For vigorous activity, you want headphones that will stay in place and stand up to sweat or rain. Check out these great workout headphones.

One to consider: the Scosche SportClip 3, $30, which is billed as splashproof and dustproof. It has bendable ear clips that fit around the ear, a plus if you’re bouncing along a bumpy road or bending down to grab a barbell. The Jabra Sport Pulse Wireless, $200, has a built-in heart-rate monitor that uses a sensor in one of the earbuds. It works with a free app for Android and Apple devices. Readings are quite accurate, according to our tests.

Do you hate cords?

Most headphones connect to devices with a cord, but we’re seeing more wireless headphones that can save you from flapping cords and annoying tangles. Five Bluetooth models in our Ratings can operate up to 30 feet from a device. Keep in mind that they run on batteries, and it can be a pain if the batteries conk out during a long trip.

Are you an in-ear or over-ear fan?

To figure out which one you are, consider the advantages of each type. For on-the-go listening, you might want headphones small enough to stash in a pocket or purse. Earbuds or inserts are as teeny as they come. Recommended models include the Sennheiser CX 215, $40, and the Panasonic RP-TCM125, $20.

If you’re the talkative type, consider headphones that double as a phone headset. Bose FreeStyle earbuds, $130, are highly rated and have a built-in microphone and in-line controls for switching from music to a call with the press of a button—no need to grab the phone.

Headphone size is less of a concern at home, so on-ear and over-ear models are good choices for enjoying music or movies. (You’ll see plenty of people sporting big DJ-style headphones in public, too.) Among the top headphones in this price range are the over-ear Grado SR225e, $200, and the on-ear Grado SR80e, $100, both of which have excellent sound.

Either of those designs is a good choice for serious music listening. Most of the excellent-sounding headphones in our Ratings are over-ear and on-ear models. On the other hand, if you listen mostly to MP3 music or audiobooks, top sound quality may not be as critical. In that case, you can save some bucks by choosing a lower-priced model with very good sound.

To block out chatty seatmates on a plane or prevent late-night listening from disturbing others, you’ll want headphones with a sound-isolating design. Ear inserts, such as the Sennheiser and Panasonic mentioned above, fit snugly inside the ear. Closed, over-ear headphones such as the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x, $170, which enclose the ear, also block outside sound and keep your music to yourself. To go a step further, consider a model that uses electronic noise-canceling technology (below).

The sounds of silence

If you crave quiet in the midst of mayhem, headphones that use active noise-canceling technology are the way to go. These battery-powered headphones have tiny microphones that pick up ambient sounds, then use electronic circuitry to counteract them, so you can listen to your tunes in peace. Two modestly priced models we recommend: the Phiaton BT220 NC, $180, a wireless ear insert, and the SMS Audio Street by 50-ANC, $180, a closed, over-ear pair (shown).

This article also appeared in the October 2015 issue of Consumer Reports magazine.

Consumer Reports has no relationship with any advertisers on this website. Copyright © 2006-2015 Consumers Union of U.S.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
                submit to reddit    


from Consumer Reports http://ift.tt/1LCPA0q via dryer vent cleaning jacksonville fl
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1IugP8K

New LG 4K OLED TVs Get HDR

New LG 4K OLED TVs Get HDR

If you don’t think LG Electronics is bullish on OLED TV technology, consider this: The company is tripling its OLED lineup in 2015. Among the highlights is a new fleet of flat-screen EF9500 UHD models, the first OLED TV line to come with high dynamic range (HDR) capability.

Because LG has the OLED market all to itself, though, prices, especially for larger-sized UHD sets, are still comparatively steep. The 55-inch EF9500-series model will arrive next month with a $5,500 tag, for example, and the 65-inch set will stretch to $7,000. Those prices mirror the ones for the current curved EG9600-series models, including the 55-inch set in our current TV Ratings.

If you want to go really big, the 77-inch EG9700-series model costs a staggering $25,000. By comparison, you’ll pay a pittance if you’re willing to go smaller and stick with 1080p resolution: LG’s least expensive OLED, the 55-inch EC9300, sells for just $2,300. We tested that set last year.

Like the previously released curved-screen models, the new EF9500 sets are super-thin and they come with the company’s webOS smart TV platform. They also feature built-in HDR capability, the company says, so they can handle both streaming content with HDR and HDR content from 4K UHD Blu-ray players.

LG is expected to release an update soon that will enable the EG9600-series TVs to handle streaming HDR content as well, but it doesn’t look like they’ll support Blu-ray HDR.

As we’ve said before, we’re big fans of OLED TV technology. We believe it has the promise to replace plasma as the top choice for discerning TV viewers. Make sure you check out our comprehensive TV Ratings (available to subscribers) for a full evaluation of LG’s 55EG9600 UHD OLED set.

Consumer Reports has no relationship with any advertisers on this website. Copyright © 2006-2015 Consumers Union of U.S.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
                submit to reddit    


from Consumer Reports http://ift.tt/1EpwtqV via dryer vent cleaning jacksonville fl
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1Jpldrr

The dirty little secrets of toilet paper

The dirty little secrets of toilet paper

 Think that a roll is a roll is a roll? The truth is that for years, toilet paper manufacturers have been selling less product and masking the shrinkage with hyperbole and hard-to-quantify claims. According to John T. Gourville, a marketing professor at Harvard Business School, they get away with it because consumers have a better grasp of how much an item costs than they do of the size it should be.

“They have in their minds that this toilet paper costs 79 cents and that one costs 89 cents,” he explains. “They’re not taking into account that one has fewer sheets.”

Once one company downsizes its products, others follow to avoid appearing more expensive. The maker of Angel Soft brags that its double roll has 60 percent more sheets than Charmin Ultra’s double roll. Still, those brands have many sizes, and counting sheets isn’t the only way to determine value—sheet size and thickness are also factors.

Consumer Reports contacted some customer-service representatives to find out what’s behind all the shrinkage and received a variety of explanations. Many suggested that their products had become so good that consumers actually need less of it.

A customer rep for Kimberly-Clark, maker of Cottonelle and Scott, told us that the downsizing was a marketing decision in response to rising costs for manufacturing and distribution. A follow-up statement said that product innovations yielded “better, stronger tissue, so that you need fewer sheets to get the job done.”

Procter & Gamble’s customer rep told us that reducing the number of sheets actually enabled the company to improve the quality of its flagship Charmin TP. The newer version is more flexible than previous ones, the rep said, and consumers should need much less.

Costco’s decision to trim its Kirkland Signature multipacks from 36 to 30 rolls was also explained as a less-is-more approach. A customer rep said that the company took out the six rolls to provide a better product, and that the toilet paper was actually thicker than it was before.

Manufacturers have also boosted their brand offerings to include not just single and double rolls but “mega,” “triple,” and “jumbo” variations, and other sizes. That makes comparing products even more confusing.  

Some rolls are so bulky they may not even fit their bathroom enclosures, especially the ones in older homes. Not to worry, say the makers of Charmin. The brand’s mega rolls come with a money-back guarantee if they don’t fit. So be sure to hold on to your receipt and the package’s UPC code just in case you need to claim your refund.

Our advice: Don’t flush money down the drain. Find a brand you like and stock up when it’s on sale. Check our toilet paper buying guide for more.

Sheet counts then and now

Since 2009, Consumer Reports has tested bathroom tissue multiple times. And during that span, many manufacturers have shrunk the size of their rolls. To gauge the difference, we looked at nine current products, comparing the number of sheets per roll and the size of the sheets with previous versions. We used a so-called double roll, the most popular size, as our benchmark in most cases. Be aware that some brands, such as Kirkland Signature, downsize by decreasing the number of rolls per package.

Angel Soft roll call

As companies shave sheetsthey’re expanding product lines. The king of line extensions is Angel Soft. According to its manufacturer, Georgia-Pacific, there are seven roll sizes, from 132 to 528 sheets. (Six are pictured here.) The reason for all that choice? According to a customer-service representative, they’re just different price points. But John T. Gourville, a professor of marketing at Harvard Business School, says it’s an effort to corner the market. “One issue is shelf space,” he points out. “By having a proliferation of sizes, you increase the likelihood that a consumer randomly buying toilet paper or shampoo will buy your brand. And being a good-selling brand, you can command more shelf space and take it away from a competitor.”

Beware of wipes

The packaging may say that wipes, those toilet-paper supplements, are flushable or safe for sewers and septic tanks. But after testing, we beg to differ. It took at least 10 minutes for the wipes we tested to break down into small pieces in our mixer filled with water, which provides more churning than waste pipes. When we left the wipes in water overnight, some disintegrated, some didn’t.

The bottom line. Don’t use your toilet as a wastebasket. Toss used wipes into an actual garbage can. The same advice holds true for tissues and paper towels.

This article also appeared in the October 2015 issue of Consumer Reports magazine.

Consumer Reports has no relationship with any advertisers on this website. Copyright © 2006-2015 Consumers Union of U.S.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
                submit to reddit    


from Consumer Reports http://ift.tt/1F7g7OF via dryer vent cleaning jacksonville fl
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1NG7oer

Claim check: Shiseido WetForce sunscreen

Claim check: Shiseido WetForce sunscreen

On the back of the box, the very pricey ($40 for a 3.3 ounce bottle) Shiseido WetForce Ultimate Sun Protection Lotion SPF50+ makes the following promise: “Providing powerful protection for your skin, this innovative protective veil actually becomes even more effective when it comes into contact with water.” The claim on Shiseido’s website goes further, saying that soaking in water for 30 minutes enhances the product’s ultraviolet (UV) protection by 20 percent.

If you’re going to be swimming or sweating, you want a good-performing water-resistant sunscreen, so we decided to investigate this claim by testing WetForce’s SPF (sun protection factor) in a laboratory. SPF is a measure of how well a sunscreen protects against UVB rays—the type that cause sunburn. First, our experts applied the sunscreen to dry skin on one area of our test subjects’ backs, let it dry, and then exposed that section to laboratory UVB light. Then we applied the sunscreen to a different area, let it dry, and had the subjects sit in a tub of water for 30 minutes. When they got out, we put that second area under the same UVB light. The next day, our experts examined both areas for sunburn.

We also subjected WetForce to the standard testing we perform on all sunscreens—measuring its UVB protection after the amount of time the product claims to be water resistant (in this case it was 80 minutes) and testing for protection against UVA rays, the type that cause wrinkles and skin cancer. (See our video on how we test sunscreens.)

What we found: The average SPF of Shiseido WetForce Ultimate Sun Protection Lotion SPF50+ was the same whether the testers’ skin was dry or exposed to water for 30 minutes. There was no increase in UVB protection.

In our standard sunscreen testing, WetForce did earn an Excellent rating for UVB (meaning it protects very well against sunburn), but just a Fair rating for its UVA protection. Combining the scores from our UVA and UVB testing with other performance factors, Shiseido WetForce Ultimate Sun Protection Lotion SPF50+ received a score of 40, which earned it a Fair rating for overall performance. (Our top rating is Excellent, followed by Very Good, Good, Fair, and Poor.)

We sent Shiseido a copy of our test results and methodology and asked the company for a response. Shiseido said in an e-mail: “It is our policy not to comment on testing done outside of the auspices of our company.” They also said that our findings may vary from theirs because of differences in test protocols.

Our bottom line: Given that our tests showed no improvement in UVB protection, Shiseido’s better-when-wet claim is misleading—and even potentially harmful if consumers interpret the claim to mean they don’t need to reapply the sunscreen when they get out of the water. At $40 for a 3.3 ounce bottle, Shiseido WetForce Ultimate Sun Protection Lotion SPF50+ is one of the most expensive sunscreens we’ve tested. We think that’s a high price to pay for a sunscreen that earned only a Fair rating overall in our tests, especially since we found several products that cost far less and performed better. For example, Coppertone Water Babies SPF 50 costs $10.50 for an 8-ounce bottle and received an Excellent rating for UVA and UVB protection. But whatever sunscreen you choose, be sure to reapply as soon as you get out of the water—or every two hours you’re out in the sun.

—Consumer Reports

Consumer Reports has no relationship with any advertisers on this website. Copyright © 2006-2015 Consumers Union of U.S.

Subscribe now!
Subscribe to ConsumerReports.org for expert Ratings, buying advice and reliability on hundreds of products.
Update your feed preferences
                submit to reddit    


from Consumer Reports http://ift.tt/1KtO9Tp via dryer vent cleaning jacksonville fl
from Tumblr http://ift.tt/1LJvZys